Relating Mellix and Lu
Fastwrite
You might see Barbara Mellix and Min Lu as telling very similar stories— stories about the gaps between the discourses of “Home” and “School”, and the struggles that they experienced in shifting between them. In such a view, the only real differences between their two stories are the details, the particulars: South Carolina or Shanghai, the speech of “country coloreds” or the language of the “great books”, the University of Pittsburgh or the Revolutionary Workers School, and so on.
But is that really the case? Are Mellix and Lu really arguing the same thing, just with different examples? Or are there differences we might point to between the stances they take toward learning to write, toward mastering the discourse of school? Take a few minutes to see if you can identify some possible points of disagreement between the two pieces.
Language, Power, and Identity
- John and Bridget respond to Mellix
- Kate and Amanda respond to Lu
Of Interest
“Flagships Fail on Financial Equity“, Inside Higher Education, 9/12/2019.
To Do
- Mon, 9/16, class: Read James Paul Gee’s “Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics”. I will lead our discussion. I will want to make sure you feel you understand what Gee means by “primary” and “secondary” discourses, and to see if those concepts can help us better understand the pieces we’ve read so far
- Mon, 9/16, 4:00 pm: Group C posts responses to Gloria Anzaldúa’s “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”.
- Tues, 9/17, 4:00 pm: Everyone else reads Group C’s responses and posts comments on at least two.
- Wed, 9/18, 9/13, class: We will use those responses and comments to structure our class discussion of Anzaldúa.
- Wed, 9/18, 4:00 pm: Group A posts responses to Richard Rodriguez’s “The Achievement of Desire”.
- Thurs, 9/19, 4:00 pm: Everyone else reads Group A’s responses and posts comments on at least two.
- Fri, 9/13, class: We will use those responses and comments to structure our class discussion of Rodriguez.